February 14, 2015
I got to thinking about wealthy people and how to go about comprehending the large volumes of wealth possessed by the richest people in the world. There are graphics and charts and simple facts like the fact that the bottom 41 percent of Americans have less wealth than just the Walton family alone. But i wanted to make it even more personal in a way. We can all imagine how incredible making a million dollars would be, even over the course of decades. Sit and really imagine what you would do if on your taxes next year you had seven figures as your total amount…
Now imagine that you make that every week. A million dollars a week exactly. Every week. Even the weeks you’re doing nothing. Now let’s say that happens for you from the age of 16 all the way until 66. A typical time-frame of working ages to begin and retire. A million dollars a week, every week, for 50 straight years. That’s 2.6 billion dollars. Is there a job in the world that you could imagine being justifiably paid that kind of money for? It would maybe be justified for Superman, but even then just barely. You cannot possibly EARN that kind of money. You just can’t. And then now please consider that there are roughly about 700 people who surpass this amount of money. Seven-hundred. 700 individuals who make more money than anyone could even justify making in terms of “earnings”.
But let’s take it further.
Instead of a million a week, let’s make it $1,000,000 each and every day no matter what. Let’s then go from the working period beginning at age 16 and start from the moment you are brought into this world. And let’s assume you do not spend a dime of that. And then let’s assume that you luck out with genetics and live for 100 years, dying on your 100th birthday just so we can keep the math nice and even. Now, assuming you spent none of that money, that amounts to $36.5 billion. And still, there are real people in this world who possess MORE money than this. 13 of them. 13 people who have more wealth than you would if you made a million dollars a day for no reason from the moment you leave your mother’s vagina until your death after living for 100 years, and NEVER SPENT A DIME OF IT. That’s more money than more than half of the world’s countries can say they have.
More than half of the world’s countries.
I don’t care what your reasoning, you have to be mental to think that these people have EARNED that kind of money. You cannot EARN wealth to that degree. Nothing short of saving the planet from complete destruction single-handedly deserves the term “earned” in the context of this kind of wealth. And because they didn’t really earn it, they don’t have the right to all of it. Defending such disgusting greed is morally reprehensible and absurd.
Happy Valentine’s Day everyone.
September 16, 2014
bliss, love, poem, Poetry, source, sun and moon
oh my longing for love
likens to that of how the
sun wishes to meet the
moon once again
how the shadows of
the deepest caverns
long to once again be
yielded to the light
as the dark becomes
the sun and moon
eclipse that what i
know is naught
feeling is devoid of truth
and this love to be felt
from the source
personified in a monad
of false self is
what i seek and yet not
as the goal and path
are united by this source of love
August 23, 2014
consciousness, flow, meditation, mind, samadhi, shamatha
Flow is the realization of a non-dual state of being where the action and actor are not two. This is why playing guitar for others can be difficult for me. If i become self-conscious i re-enter dualism and cut off the flow state.
After reading more of Self Liberation Through Seeing With Naked Awareness recently i am more assured in my assumption that all the forms of meditation involve the attainment of flow states in whatever the meditation entails. Whether it is the chanting of a mantra, the Jesus Prayer, the focus upon breath, emptiness, one’s awareness or mental activity, or relaxing into the mind’s intrinsic lucidity. Although varying in activity and passivity, spiritual tradition, and the locus of focus, every one of these types of “meditation” involves a very narrow and specific paradigm of mental activity which prevents the mind from flitting about in all direction and distractions, and which grounds the individual in themselves. Each one when combined with the flow state makes the realization of the type of meditation as described by the masters of that tradition.
I believe that by achieving flow in such a way an individual acquires a clearer view of the nature of reality and themselves and gains a perspective of wisdom as well as a peaceful and compassionate temperament. In this way meditation is the sublime gateway to peace, wisdom, and compassion, and it is grounded in an aspect of psychology which can be applied to all areas of one’s life.
July 22, 2014
Philosophy, Poetry, Politics/Economics
ape, existentialism, human, humility, life, nihilism, silly
I am a human.
i do and say human things.
i sometimes like other humans,
though often i loathe them as well,
and no matter what i am committed
to the seemingly programmed aim
of benefiting my fellow humans.
But being a human can be tough sometimes
with all the silly systems and structures
put in place by some humans
to make life unnecessarily difficult
for other humans. i believe this
is because humans fear thinking,
which inevitably comes without something to distract our silly little ape minds.
It’s important to remember what we are,
to not take ourselves too seriously,
and to not forget that we basically
just shouldn’t harm each other or the planet.
All other silly ape desires you have are fine to pursue,
but they are just that.
Humans are dumb.
You are dumb.
I am dumb.
Let’s just play nice and have fun and
not stop other people from having fun.
If you think the other clothed apes are having fun wrong,
all you can do is show them how you
are having way more fun doing whatever you’re doing.
Telling them they’re having fun wrong
and arguing against them will change
nothing except making both you and them have less fun.
Have your fun, and
if you have enough of it,
others will join.
Because we’re just silly, fun-crazed apes after all.
June 15, 2014
37, bodhisattva, buddhahood, Christ-like, christianity, comparative, how to be, practices, religion, saints
About four years ago i went through the Tibetan Buddhist text The 37 Bodhisattva Practices and analyzed them in the context of Christianity to such an extent that (hopefully) a Christian with no knowledge or interest in Buddhism could still benefit from the wisdom if sincerely desiring to be Christ-like. This text has been very helpful for many Buddhists just beginning on the spiritual path as well as very wise veterans of it. Reading it i was feeling it had all the potential of being adapted to another religion, and since at the time i was in a Christian club at school (for the sake of the spiritual discussion), and because i wanted to learn more about the contents of the Bible, i figured i would begin with the Christian adaptation. The Christian model of the saint fit very well as a parallel for a Bodhisattva, and Buddhahood as becoming Christ-like (of course the comparison is by no means perfect, but still i find there is value in this kind of cross-religious analysis and the basis of differences are beyond the scope or intent of this piece of writing). This should (hopefully) be as useful to Buddhists seeking a better understanding or appreciation for the Christian faith as it is to Christians in aiding their spiritual development. I focused on using only verses from the Old and New Testaments, so that its validity would be less questionable to any Christians who don’t have knowledge of or faith in the apocryphal writings. No doubt the addition of these texts would yield a great wealth of relevant verses to add as references. I will also note that i did not include the text of the verses referenced, due mostly to the sake of saving space. I welcome any and all feedback, and/or dissemination of this text for constructive spiritual purposes.
Click here to download the PDF.
Click here to download the DOC
Note that it will be updated periodically as useful feedback comes in.
Thank you all!
Jacob Ibrahim Abuhamada
May 31, 2014
capital, compassion, debate, dialogue, discussion, economics, finance, law, policy, politics, society
I don’t like politics or economics. I don’t like them, because they engender such powerful emotions and conflict. The matters they involve are the most direct in affecting the overall condition of life itself for a society. I love religion, because people can be content with dialoguing in a kindly manner and the assumption that in the end “we’ll see who was right” but until that time, religion is just a purely personal thing. Politics and economics affect society at large and the smallest decisions at that level have enormous consequences for the suffering of a society. Nothing is clear cut, and you can’t be content with “we’ll see who was right in the end,” because doing so means potentially unraveling the fabric of society or causing immense suffering and pain for future generations. In some cases it can mean saving countless lives and livelihoods. I recognize that as a spiritual person, my highest goal is the reformation of global society into a place of happiness, well-being, wisdom, and freedom. This is the goal of science as well. But one must remember that politics and economics (in theory) have this very same intent. The problem being of course that no one really knows for sure what the best way of doing things is, and you can’t just be content with differing views. Another’s view could mean you lose your job, your most cherished freedom, or your life. So what can we do?
I have great respect for those who can dedicate themselves to the most contentious of subjects and fight for their opinion of the most effective policy to benefit their society. This is a noble aim (not to say that all such devoted individuals are devoted to this aim in particular. Many are of course power-hungry, status-craving, sociopaths, but i do hold respect for those who aren’t). We all can’t have perfect knowledge of the infinitely complex political and economic systems. We will all have our views on the best specific policy, and we are all likely to fight passionately over our particular chosen views. In the end, we won’t really know what the best policy is. One socio-economic system may work perfectly in one society, but be chaos in another.
What we can be sure of, is that we all (excluding the sociopaths) have the best interest of society in mind. We should remember that when discussing such contentious issues with others. Religion has the benefit of sacredness, which usually commands respect from people, making dialogue much easier. Even debates between the most conservative of religious fundamentalists rarely results in emotional outbursts at one another, and this is because of the embrace of the sacredness. I think it’s important that we transmute this force of sanctity to all contentious subjects, as it allows for the most constructive of dialogues and helps all sides to remember what the primary aim actually is: The benefit of society.
Sure many people hold views that are purely going to affect their own lives for the better, but this isn’t always the case. And even for such individuals, they have convinced themselves with full certainty of the positions they hold and why those policies are the best for all in society. We don’t have the right to deny them of this, just as we don’t have the right to deny a religious view. The intent is still in the right place, even if it took some serious cognitive dissonance to get there.
Now i’m not saying to just be complacent with others’ views if you really think they are harming society. Please do not think this. Fight for your all-important social or economic or political cause (i sure will). Again, i simply ask that people always remember that the final aim is the benefit of the whole of society. If this truly becomes the motivation for all individuals who discuss these subjects i hate so much, then i believe most problems would fix themselves and the society in question would reach the most effective equilibrium. So please, fight on for your view, but remember that your end goal is a compassionate one, and argue under the assumption that the person you’re attempting to dissuade or disprove or debate with is operating under the very same principle of compassion. It’s the best we can do until such time as we enter a utopian world of unity and understanding, or we die as a species.